![[I*EARN]](../iearnlogotiny.gif)
(written by iearn@iearn.org, 03/22/1996)
/* Written 5:53 AM Nov 9, 1995 by coldspring in igc:iearn.tc */ To: peg:sthildas From: coldspring@igc.apc.org Subject: next millenium Dear Prue, I agree with you in that people who see the next millenium as a starting point for their lives are being quite ignorant about the fact that their problems will still remain. A date with ?/?/2000 is not going to change any of the world's problems or change anyone's personal problems, but rather just means we are further on in time with the same problems still at our side. Time alone changes nothing! As I see it, the opening of the next millenium should be marked as a convenient starting point to work from in a technological sense, to promote actively the kind of changes needed. If you review all that has happened in just past century, it is hard to imagine what will come over a millenium where the rate at which the world is modernizing is increasing exponentially. To survive through the next century, we must strengthen our U.N. and other forms of international cooperation or else we won't have to worry about all our other problems since we'll probably destroy ourselves. With the potential to blow up our planet 100 times over with the nuclear weapons of today, and more destructive discoveries surely to come, global cooperation must be improved if we are to avert the destruction of our planet. From an environmental standpoint, the world is facing trouble because with new technology and modernization comes pollution and environmental threats of other types. The world must cooperate not only to establish peace but to stop the degradation of our environment and to give mother nature time to replenish herself. If these goals can be met, then the next millenium looks brighter than the world right now. Talk to you later. Matt Baskir (Grade 11)