The following samples of dialogue were taken from I*EARN's computer teleconference on the Holocaust (iearn.hgp). The Holocaust/Genocide Project's on-line conference houses many different discussions on a variety of topics.
This portion of the discussion of the Holocaust deals with
the books MAUS and MAUS II, written by Art Spiegelman, and
the reactions they evoked [in those who read them]. This
discussion is being introduced to you by a U.S. History
class in Shorewood High School, Seattle, Washington. We
invite you to participate in this debate. Please understand
that the reactions you are [about] to read were written by
students who have read these books. We hope that you will be
able to enjoy these short writings, the purpose of which is
to stimulate thought on what it was like for someone to have
gone through this period.
D. Ratner, T. Patrick, and D. Reynard
Shorewood High School, Washington
United States
In the comic book MAUS, Art Spiegelman teaches the reader
about the Holocaust and what horrible things, like the
concentration camps, the Jews had to go through. Also, he
teaches us to never forget what happened in the Holocaust.
He chose to represent the people in that way because humans
can [be] cruel, as can animals. He picked the mice to
represent the Jews because mice are helpless, and they
cannot defend themselves like most other animals can. He
chose to represent the Germans with cats because they
control the fate of the mice.
I think the format is very good because it lets you see
what really happened to the people during the Holocaust. I
think having this book in comic form catches peoples'
attention so that they want to read it. I know that I liked
reading this more in comic book form rather than in book
form. In the story, when Art talks to his dad about the
concentration camps, and when his father gets one of his
friends a pair of shoes and a belt, I thought that that part
was expressed in a very good way. It showed what people had
to go through just for their basic rights. Art's father was
luckier than most because a lot of people did not make it
out alive and [their] whole families were completely wiped
out.
Courtney Kapp
Shorewood High School, Washington
United States
The serious comic book MAUS, written by Art Spiegelman,
shows how cruel the Nazis were to Jews, just because of
their religion or how they looked. Hitler was for an Aryan
nation, but he had brown hair and brown eyes. [He] was a
selfish, idiotic murderer with double standards. This story
shows the reader that the Jews had nowhere to go and that
they were always living in fear of being caught. They never
knew if they would even live until dinner, or if they would
have any. MAUS teaches that the Holocaust greatly impacted
the survivors in many negative ways. For example, Art's
father is so frugal; it may be because he had to conserve
his food in the Nazi camps and he did it for so long that
it's now habit.
The Jews are represented by mice, Poles by pigs, Germans by
cats, and Americans by dogs. I think the reason Art
Spiegelman portrayed people of different countries as
certain animals is that cats eat mice, dogs chase away cats,
and some Poles of that era were pigs for letting the Nazis
do what they did.
Art Spiegelman's format is very effective. When something is
in comic book form, I want to read it. It's a lot more
entertaining than reading a pictureless book. When you see
the character during the entire book it's as if you know the
person, like you are there.
Matthew Lehde
Shorewood High School, Washington
United States
In the comic book MAUS, Art Spiegelman shows the reader
what people, mostly Jews, went through during the Holocaust.
Art Spiegelman shows through his comic book that the
Holocaust was a time of great pain and suffering that will
live on in people's minds forever. He shows the reader, in
steps, the reactions of the people who were forced to live
in the camps. I learned a lot more about the Holocaust
through reading [MAUS] than any other reading or lecture.
Now I realize that the Holocaust just wasn't bad; it was
something so tremendous that it had a great effect on anyone
who survived it.
Throughout MAUS, it was portrayed that it was awful to be
killing so many people and treating them like animals. I
think that is why Spiegelman chose to represent people as
animals. He represents mice as Jews because they were
experimented on as if they were mice. Pigs are supposed to
be Poles because they "stunk." They were so under Hitler's
command that they didn't care what happened to the Jews. The
Poles turned their backs on the Jews after living with them
for so long. The characters couldn't have been portrayed
better; it was perfect.
Spiegelman writes so that he keeps his readers informed and
fulfilled, so that they will want to read on. I wanted to
keep reading because I was intrigued to find out what would
happen next. I think the idea of a comic book was a
brilliant one because it grabs people's attention. It's
something unusual for this kind of subject and that's what
makes it such a terrific one. The Holocaust's survivors were
damaged for life; it seems that they have and will continue
to remember it very vividly. MAUS really makes people stop
and think about how the Holocaust was. I thought that
Spiegelman did the best job on explaining the Holocaust,
that it was one of the best pieces of literature I've ever
read about the Holocaust.
Shannon White
Shorewood High School, Washington
United States
Art Spiegelman used animals to portray the image of
superiority given to us by Hitler. He used the mice for
Jewish people to show how Hitler viewed them as inferior.
The Germans were given to us as cats, the most feared
creature for the mouse. The way Hitler saw [it], the Germans
were the [most] superior race on the planet. Later in the
book, Spiegelman brought the Americans in as dogs, a species
of animals that constantly wreaks havoc upon the cat. The
book was well written by Spiegelman, and I enjoyed the way
he displayed the characters. He efficiently used the
characters to paint a realistic image of what the Holocaust
was really like. I honestly felt as if it was almost a part
of me after completing the book, and it even gave me the
thought of tears after the end. I enjoyed the book in this
format as it allows the author/writer to let his readers see
the experience as he did, as told to Speigelman by his
father. I especially liked it when, and how, he used the
scenes of him and his father talking, to show how he was
similar, and yet different, to the Vladek of the Holocaust.
I wish people in today's literary world would try to use
this technique of writing more often, so that I might better
follow the story written by the author.
Ken Perkins,
Shorewood High School, Washington
United States
I read with interest some of the discussion about MAUS and
MAUS II. One person had said that MAUS was disturbing, and
one must read MAUS II in order to appreciate them both. I
posted some thoughts [in the teleconference]. I found MAUS
to be interesting and not at all offensive or insensitive.
One thing I did was to read it very slowly so I could "hear"
the father speaking. Perhaps I have heard others speaking
English as their second language and didn't let the poor
grammar get in the way of the genuine feelings and ideas.
I feel empathy for the son who is trying to get along with
his father the best he can, but his best is never enough for
his father. And his father is unreasonably rigid; I have
seen this characteristic in some people in my life as they
grow older.
Perhaps the last generation's attitudes linked to living
through the "Depression" is the closest thing to the things
that the father clings to in MAUS. Economizing and recycling
are not new ideas, but they certainly are evident in the
father in these two books.
MAUS was full of details (drawings, words, events) tying
together things that I had read and heard from various
sources. To me it was a vivid web, tying facts and emotions
into one sad story.
I read MAUS II on the trip back from Israel. It allows the
reader to be privy to some of the anguish and doubts
Spiegelman went through in trying to write the story of his
father and mother in order to share their experiences in the
Holocaust. Because much of the text is Art's and/or his
wife's thoughts or dialogue, it is in more standard English,
and I found it much faster reading. The pictures and story
line reinforced so many things that I saw in Poland: e.g.,
the bunk beds, the incredibly harsh treatment by others, the
crematoriums, etc. I think MAUS II does a good job of
showing how much resourcefulness, luck, and willpower were
needed to survive during the Holocaust. It also drives home
how dedicated Art is to getting his father' s story down,
even though it is not a priority to his father. And Art
struggles to keep his own life from being bogged down by the
demands of his father. I admire him for trying to capture
his father's story, for trying to meet many of his father's
needs, and for resisting the guilt trip his dad kept trying
to lay on him.
Art and Francoise (his wife) knew that trying to please the
old man by living with him after Mala left would destroy
their lives; no matter how much they cared, they knew it
wasn't for the best. Perhaps I can understand this aspect
better because I am now an adult dealing with parents on a
different level than when I was a teenager. QUESTION: Teens,
do you agree or disagree with me on this last statement?
One constant in these books is that the children of
survivors are "survivors" themselves and have a whole set of
needs and emotional obstacles that should be recognized as
valid in themselves. Survivors also must live with the fact
that others died and they did not.
During my recent Poland/Israel trip, I was reminded of both
of these time and time again as each Israeli I talked to had
his/her own link to those who perished in the Holocaust. It
impacts their lives in a real and personal way and they each
find a way to deal with it.
The memorial ceremonies we held at the Holocaust sites were
emotionally hard. (The short novel that follows the short
story in "The Shawl" also deals with the difficulty of
living as a survivor.)
After getting used to the characters, the only times I even
noticed that Spiegleman used animals for his characters were
when he briefly showed his characters as having masks on. I
know this was done deliberately, and I would be interested
in other's thoughts on it.
I think a natural pecking order was suggested by the use of
mice, dogs, cats, pigs, dog, and frogs. But I read the story
as if it were people and found many parallels with people
I've known.
I also thought his artistic expression and layout techniques
were unusual at times and always very effective and worth
studying for that alone!
Julie Rosenoff
Spokane Valley High School, Washington
United States
Copyright © 1995-2005 by iEARN. All rights reserved.
Access the HGP's An End to Intolerance Web page.
Access the Holocaust/Genocide Project's Home Page.